From: Jeff King Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:50:55 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Suggested for PU: revision caching system to significantly speed up packing/walking Message-ID: <20090808025055.GA14731@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <7vzlabp7e4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > The cache file for all of the linux repository (as of a few weeks ago) > > is around 42MB, without names. The names would probably add 2 or 3 MB > > on top of that. That's probably about as big as I'd want to get, > > Hmm. .git/objects/ as of today is about 482M here, so we are talking > about roughly 10% overhead? IIRC from previous discussions, kernel.org's main performance problem is I/O, not CPU. Are there any provisions for sharing rev-caches between similar repositories, as we already do for objects? -Peff