From: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:05:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Request for benchmarking: x86 SHA1 code
Message-ID: <20090731140532.18327.qmail@science.horizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090731132702.GY12813@osiris.978.org>

> The revised code is faster on Intel Atom N270 by around 15% (results below
> typical of several runs):
> 
> $ ./586test ; ./x86test 
> Result:  a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
> Expected:a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
> 500000000 bytes: 4.981760 s
> Result:  a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
> Expected:a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
> 500000000 bytes: 4.323324 s

Cool, thanks!  I hadn't optimized it at all for Atom's
in-order pipe, so I'm pleasantly surprised.