From: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:05:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] send-email: fix a typo in a comment
Message-ID: <200906090905.58446.markus.heidelberg@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <7vljo2wgco.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano, 08.06.2009:
> Thanks; is there any patch among the six that should go to 'maint' (aka
> 1.6.3.X)?

[PATCH 4/6] add a test for git-send-email for non-threaded mails
[PATCH 5/6] send-email: fix non-threaded mails

fix the regression from commit 3e0c4ff (send-email: respect in-reply-to
regardless of threading, 2009-03-01), which was included before 1.6.3
and so is included in 'maint', so they should go to 'maint'. I'll resend
rebased.

[PATCH 1/6] send-email: fix a typo in a comment
[PATCH 2/6] add a test for git-send-email for threaded mails without chain-reply-to
[PATCH 3/6] send-email: fix threaded mails without chain-reply-to

fix commit 15da108 ("send-email: 'References:' should only reference
what is sent", 2009-04-13), which was included after 1.6.3 directly to
'master', so they don't go to 'maint'.

I don't know how documentation fixes are handled for inclusion to
'maint', but this could apply to 'maint' as well:

[PATCH 6/6] doc/send-email: clarify the behavior of --in-reply-to with --no-thread