From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:13:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Introduce die_errno() that appends strerror(errno) to die()
Message-ID: <20090606221320.GB30064@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <3672f22723a4c14c4a6d67278e9865424c0c68dc.1244299302.git.trast@student.ethz.ch>

On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:44:51PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:

> Code by Jeff King and Alexander Potashev, name by Johannes Sixt.
> [...]
> +void die_errno(const char *err, ...)
> +{
> +	va_list params;
> +	char msg[1024];
> +
> +	va_start(params, err);
> +
> +	vsnprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), err, params);
> +	die("%s: %s", msg, strerror(errno));
> +
> +	va_end(params);
> +}
> +

No, this approach is much more elegant than what I posted, so no need to
credit me, at least. ;)

I do agree with Johannes, though. Style-wise, it reads much better as:

  va_start(params, err);
  vsnprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), err, params);
  va_end(params);

  die("%s: %s", msg, strerror(errno));

since you can more easily see that params isn't leaked (and that die,
which doesn't return, is the _last_ thing called).

-Peff