From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 18:10:23 GMT
Subject: Re: git merge remote branch says
Message-ID: <20090522181023.GA11913@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090522T175633-762@post.gmane.org>

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:08:41PM +0000, Eric Raible wrote:

> I wasn't trying to argue that a pull would be a good idea, but more
> that it's not that expensive because of the content-addressable
> nature of git's object store.
> 
> And saying that is "might be costly" could be misleading to people
> who haven't groked how a commit is a commit is a commit.

OK, then I agree with you. My "costly" was just "I don't want to touch
the network if I don't have to".

-Peff