From: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:52:53 GMT
Subject: Re: Suggested Workflow Question
Message-ID: <200903181452.53497.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090318T125717-946@post.gmane.org>

onsdag 18 mars 2009 14:00:51 skrev Roger Garvin <yoyodyn@gmail.com>:
> Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > We've done a ton of that. Even better than emailing is that you can
> > have a repo on a usb stick/disk.
> > 
> 
> That would be great except that most of our customers do not technically allow
> us to plug USB drives into any of their computers.  It's a rather silly rule
> actually but the drives could be confiscated. 
> 
> Thank you for the links to the other thread.  I will read through those today.
> I am hoping that this is simpler in practice than it looks on paper, cause what
> I see on paper is a fully connected graph of all our employees with all our
> customers multiple source locations and with our office server.  It seems like
> it could get out of control for tracking where changes might be (who is holding
> them)

Don't forget the option of mailing bundles (man git-bundle). Those will give the effect of push/fetch via e-mail. I.e. the exact same commit SHA's get replicated, That may be relevant for the branches that contain your released/official test code.

-- robin