From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:45:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --format that is a synonym to --pretty
Message-ID: <20090224054524.GE4615@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vprh8mm9k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:33:59PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I think the patch suffers from the same problem Felipe's patch had, by
> conflating two issues.  Because it had the ":some string with %" shorthand

Yes, I totally agree they are two separate issues, and it should be two
patches.

> If we split this round into two patches, one that makes --format a synonym
> to --pretty, and then another one that allows --{format,pretty}='%h %s',
> and *stop there*, then we wouldn't have difficulties.

Right, and I am OK with that. I just wanted to make sure we were not
painting ourselves into a corner for a "patch 3/2" that has been
discussed.

> I do not think --oneline is a bad idea, but I do not think we should
> explain it as "You can write anything that you can write after '--pretty='
> without 'pretty=' and they mean the same thing".  That's where your
> concern arises from.  You just say "'--pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit' is
> so often used, so we have a shorthand for the whole thing: --oneline",
> without implying anything about other things such as --short or --tformat.

OK. I think that is reasonable. Personally, I would really only care
about --oneline, anyway (and I do think a --pretty=%h shorthand should
use "tformat"; the extra typing is probably not a big deal if you are
doing a big multi-line format).

-Peff