From: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:59:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [JGIT PATCH] 1/2 : (reworked) Externalizable/Serializable Items
Message-ID: <200902182159.51027.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090218163002.GB22848@spearce.org>

Shawn wrote:
> > +            os.writeUTF(KEY_FETCH);
> > +            os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        for (RefSpec refspec : push) {
> > +        	os.writeUTF(KEY_PUSH);
> > +            os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > +        }
> 
> Should we maybe allow RefSpec to serialize itself with
> os.writeObject() rather than using writeUTF() directly?

Doesn't the style above make it easy to define and document
a format that is easy for non-java programs to write and read,
while writeObject introduces java-centric stuff (depending on
the full class name etc).

-- robin