From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:58:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] remote: use exact HEAD lookup if it is available
Message-ID: <20090215195826.GA26740@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090215061818.GE30414@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:18:18AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> A possible 6/5 would be to do something similar for local repos (or
> resurrecting the HEAD proposal).

Here is a quick and dirty series to unambiguously determine the HEAD for
local repos, but I am undecided on whether this is actually a good idea.

Note that this fails Jay's tests in t5505 which expect the ambiguity; to
be considered for inclusion, it would need to test "../two" as a remote
as well as "file://$(pwd)/../two", making sure each behaved correctly.

But I am posting it here to stimulate discussion on whether it is even
something we want.

  1/2: transport: cleanup duplicated ref fetching code
  2/2: transport: unambiguously determine local HEAD

-Peff