From: Jakub Narebski Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:48:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: ensure the default stylesheet is accessible Message-ID: <200901260248.22120.jnareb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1232933322-9186-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > On some installations the CSS fails to be linked correctly when > path_info is enabled, since the link refers to "gitweb.css", whereas it > should be "${my_uri}/gitweb.css". Fix by setting the appropriate default > in the Makefile. Why "on some installations"? What does "some" mean? I don't think it is something indeterministic: please spell when one can have problems with linking CSS file. Wouldn't it be simpler to deal with problem of base URL when using path_info gitweb URLs to add BASE element to HTML head if we use path_info? Something like: if ($ENV{'PATH_INFO'}) { # $path_info is unfortunately stripped print qq(\n); } somewhere in git_header_html() subroutine? See also comment below. > > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta > --- > Makefile | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 4ef8234..4f60de9 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ GITWEB_STRICT_EXPORT = > GITWEB_BASE_URL = > GITWEB_LIST = > GITWEB_HOMETEXT = indextext.html > -GITWEB_CSS = gitweb.css > +GITWEB_CSS = $${my_uri}/gitweb.css > GITWEB_LOGO = git-logo.png > GITWEB_FAVICON = git-favicon.png It is not the same case for git-logo.png and git-favicon.png as for gitweb.css? If it is not, please explain why in commit message. If it is, then your patch is only partial solution to path_info problem. > GITWEB_SITE_HEADER = > -- > 1.5.6.5 > > -- Jakub Narebski Poland