From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:30:48 GMT
Subject: Re: John (zzz) Doe <john.doe@xz> (Comment)
Message-ID: <20090121203048.GB5400@roro3.zxlink>
In-Reply-To: <7vzlhlic7d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:12:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> writes:
> > Is it ok?
> 
> I think the patch text looks good, but what you have as the proposed
> commit log message does not look anything like log message we usually use.
> 
>  - If you agree with my comment that "should NOT be included" from the RFC
>    you quoted is irrelevant, then I do not think you would even want to
>    have anything before "On the other hand,...".
> 
>  - If you disagree, then why are you bending the patch text to match what
>    I say? ;-)

I agree, really :)

It's only me usually tired in the end of the day, like today too.

I'll try to have a rest and will reply with updated patch.

Thanks,
Kirill