From: Pierre Habouzit Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:27:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: add git_commit_non_empty_tree and --prune-empty. Message-ID: <20090111142732.GA18484@artemis.corp> In-Reply-To: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:35:15PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:29:15PM +0000, Jay Soffian wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:58:44AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > Bump, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99440/ > > > > > > (I'd like to see this included. Having a bunch of empty commits after > > > using filter-branch to remove unwanted files from history is, er, > > > sub-optimal, so seems like it might even be default behavior?) > > > > Yeah I have that in my own git tree, and I meant to ask if something had > > to be fixed for it to be accepted for some time, but always forget about > > it. > > > > Junio, do you think this could be accepted, or does it need some work ? > > AFAICT Junio had some style issues which were not addressed. Huh, I did in a latter resend in that very thread. > And I suggested to merge the tests with Sverre's patch. That suggestion > also went unaddressed. I can't find any mails from Sverre in the same thread, but maybe I'm not searching in the proper place... -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org