From: Ingo Molnar Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:20:10 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset --hard/read-tree --reset -u: remove unmerged new paths Message-ID: <20081016072010.GA19188@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <7vy70ppiq1.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> * Junio C Hamano wrote: > When aborting a failed merge that has brought in a new path using "git > reset --hard" or "git read-tree --reset -u", we used to first forget > about the new path (via read_cache_unmerged) and then matched the > working tree to what is recorded in the index, thus ending up leaving > the new path in the work tree. i've met this problem in various variants in the past few months, and i always assumed that it's "as designed" - as Git's policy is to never lose information unless forced to do so. (which i find very nice in general, and which saved modification from getting lost a couple of times in the past) the situations where i end up with a messed up working tree [using git-c427559 right now]: - doing a conflicted Octopus merge will leave the tree in some weird half-merged state, with lots of untracked working tree files that not even a hard reset will recover from. The routine thing i do to clean up is: git reset --hard HEAD git checkout HEAD . git ls-files --others | xargs rm # DANGEROUS doing git checkout -f alone is not enough, as there might be various dangling files left around. - git auto-gc thinking that it needs to do another pass in the middle of a random git operation, but i dont have 10 minutes to wait so i decide to Ctrl-C it. - doing the wrong "git checkout" and then Ctlr-C-ing it can leave the working tree in limbo as well, needing fixups. If i'm stuck between two branches that rename/remove files it might need the full fixup sequence above. - if a testbox has a corrupted system clock, its git repo and the kernel build can get confused. This is to be expected i think - but the full sequence above will recover the corrupted tree. Not much Git can do about this i guess. Does your fix mean that all i have to do in the future is a hard reset back to HEAD, and that dangling files are not supposed to stay around? Ingo