From: Marc Weber <marco-oweber@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:26:54 GMT
Subject: What about renaming ga -i [r]evert to [r]eset ?
Message-ID: <20081005152654.GA13618@gmx.de>

Hi,

Some time ago I told a friend to use ga -i  [r](evert).. and I thought
it would do the same as svn revert (set the working copy back to the
state recorded in repo (which git checkout does)..

The ga -i help display reveals that reverting does reset the index
(cache to be comitted) instead.
I think it's better to rename the command [r]evert to [r]eset ?

I've also added the command [c]heckout last.

You can get the patch from git://mawercer.de/git_my_patches branch
revert_to_reset_renaming

Maybe someone of you beeing more familiar with perl,
git-add--interactive and git can review it maybe telling me what should
be done so that it can be committed upstream?

Thanks
Marc