From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:03:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: autonumber by default
Message-ID: <20081002200333.GA29303@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <1222970291-5337-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 07:58:11PM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

> format-patch is often used for multiple patches at once when sending a
> patchset, in which case we want to number the patches; on the other
> hand, single-patches are not usually expected to be numbered.
> 
> The typical behavior expected by format-patch is therefore the one
> obtained by enabling autonumber, which should thus be the default.

I personally do not agree with this default. My usual use of
format-patch is to dump a cluster of miscellaneous patches since
"origin", and then grab the one(s) I want by title.

However, I would not be surprised to find that my use is unlike that of
most other people[1], so I am not opposed to the patch.

[1] Actually, my use has a deficiency, which is that I am often sending
2/4, without nobody having seen 1/4, on which it might actually depend.
This works in practice for me because I am often producing unrelated
janitorial patches for git. :)

So I think the goal is reasonable, but:

> ---
>  builtin-log.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Documentation update?

-Peff