From: Shawn O. Pearce Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:07:42 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] remove vim syntax highlighting in favor of upstream Message-ID: <20080924180742.GB3669@spearce.org> In-Reply-To: <20080924175315.GA10337@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King wrote: > [Shawn cc'd as the interim maintainer. I, for one, welcome our > new Java-programming overlords]. Heh. > Here is a patch, then. Shawn, we should probably give any vim users a > few days to object in case there is something they don't like about the > upstream version, but other than that, I think this should be applied to > master. Thanks. Its queued in my pile of patches waiting for ACKs and/or comments before I actually apply them to my tree. I'll let it sit for a little, but I think we want to apply it. > -- >8 -- > remove vim syntax highlighting in favor of upstream > > As of version 7.2, vim ships with its own syntax > highlighting for git commit messages, which is: > > 1. more comprehensive in splitting up the various > components of the file > > 2. in accordance with the usual vim behavior for syntax > highlighting (e.g., respecting b:current_syntax) > > 3. presumably better maintained (I have not been using > what's in git's contrib/ directory for some time in > favor of the upstream version) > > This patch gets rid of our local version and just points > interested parties to the upstream version. -- Shawn.