From: Shawn O. Pearce Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:34:48 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: add new format 'refbasename' Message-ID: <20080829143448.GC7403@spearce.org> In-Reply-To: <0329f1ab2642e1dab701b5fc6517bfb1b4ea2d46.1220004755.git.szeder@ira.uka.de> SZEDER GGGbor wrote: > Therefore, we introduce a new for-each-ref format called 'refbasename', > which strips everything before and including the second '/' in the ref's > name from the output. > > I assumed that refs always look like 'refs/{heads,tags,whatever}/foo', > hence this patch breaks if a ref might look like 'refs/foo' or just > 'foo'. But can I really rely on that? > > diff --git a/builtin-for-each-ref.c b/builtin-for-each-ref.c > index 21e92bb..1993ff4 100644 > --- a/builtin-for-each-ref.c > +++ b/builtin-for-each-ref.c > @@ -577,6 +578,10 @@ static void populate_value(struct refinfo *ref) > char *s = xmalloc(len + 4); > sprintf(s, "%s^{}", ref->refname); > v->s = s; > + } else if (!strcmp(name, "refbasename")) { > + char * p = strchr(ref->refname, '/'); > + p = strchr(p+1, '/'); > + v->s = p+1; Please be careful here and check for !p. A refname may be missing one or two '/' in which case you will cause the process to segfault. I don't think its a good idea to assume you'll always have to '/' in the name. "refs/foo" can be created by git-update-ref. Or if we ever started to report on HEAD this output tag would crash. Also, as a style nit, its "p + 1" not "p+1". Test cases? On the other hand, I like where this is going. Given that it has such a nice effect on the bash completion for larger repos I'd like to see it in Git. -- Shawn.