From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:26:09 GMT
Subject: Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
Message-ID: <20080730042609.GB3350@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807291006070.3334@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:25:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jeff King wrote:
> > 
> > I glanced briefly over "gitk kernel/printk.c" and it looks pretty sane.
> 
> Jeff, it _is_ sane. When Roman says it's "incorrect", he is just wrong.

I agree with you, btw. It is definitely correct and useful; however, I
am curious if there is some "in between" level of simplification that
might produce an alternate graph that has interesting features. And that
is why I am trying to get Roman to lay out exactly what it is he wants.

-Peff