From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:02:12 GMT
Subject: Re: Hackontest ideas?
Message-ID: <20080729020212.GI10151@machine.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <fcaeb9bf0807281855w3b06f624q18f5ac76a3bb405c@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:55:32AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On 7/29/08, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:55:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >  > Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> writes:
> >  >
> >  > > (What feature in Git or a Git-related tool would you implement, given 24
> >  > > hours staight and unlimited pizza supply?)
> >  >
> >  > "Use 'assume unchanged' bit to implement narrow checkout".
> >
> >
> > I think Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy is already working on this? (Though I think
> >  he does not use the assume unchanged bit; but this will be likely done
> >  before the end of September.)
> 
> You are welcome to do ;) I got to narrow checkout from subtree
> checkout where 'assume unchanged' bit was unapplicable so my approach
> is a bit different, but probably 'assume unchanged' bit is the right
> way to go.

But I rather liked the elegancy of just narrowing this down to a
particular subtree. Is there really a good reason to generalize this
further?

				Petr "Pasky" Baudis