From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:58:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added --export option to git-send-email.
Message-ID: <20080714025842.6630c47e@linux360.ro>
In-Reply-To: <32541b130807131642k1382cf84gdf5e8bb8d2ff4ffe@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:42:35 -0400
"Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/13/08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >  If this additional option claims to produce a mbox, I think:
> >
> >   (1) quoting only /^From / (not /^>*From/) to be consistent with
> > the standard practice is the right thing to do; and
> >
> >   (2) reading side might need to also pay attention to /^>From /,
> > in case somebody feeds an output from this option back to
> > send-email.
> >
> >  However, strictly speaking,(2) may break the standard workflow of
> >  generating patches with format-patch and feeding the result to
> > send-email, as format-patch does not do /^From / munging (and it
> > shouldn't).
> 
> Note that it's generally very bad practice to do (2) unless you always
> quote /^>*From/.  Quoting only /^From/ and *then* trying to dequote it
> correctly actually increases the number of places where you can
> corrupt a message.  As a sign that very few programs do (2), I think
> it's pretty clear that a lot more people see "From" rewritten as
> ">From" in their mail app of choice than the reverse.

Junio is right when he says we should match against "From " instead of
"From" (i.e. we should not touch lines beginning with "Fromage" for
example). Should I resubmit or can it be corrected during the merge?
 
> There is also some debate about what "standard practice" means.  See:
> http://homepages.tesco.net/J.deBoynePollard/FGA/mail-mbox-formats.html
> .

When I started working on this, I visited Wikipedia which provided a
link to qmail's site, which looks quite authoritative on this matter:
http://www.qmail.org/man/man5/mbox.html

I just followed that spec.

> If git is going to start actually producing mbox files (as opposed to
> just individual messages as it does now), it should probably
> explicitly take a stance on the issue... or perhaps make it
> configurable.
> 
> Have fun,
> 
> Avery