From: Dmitry Potapov Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:39:52 GMT Subject: Re: [q] git-diff --reverse 7def2be1..7def2be1^ Message-ID: <20080706203951.GB1721@dpotapov.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <7vprpqdbjx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:04:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Two other shorthands for naming a set that is formed by a commit > and its parent commits exists. `r1{caret}@` notation means all > parents of `r1`. `r1{caret}!` includes commit `r1` but excludes > its all parents. So, I would say that rev^! is shorthand for rev^@..rev, but it does not actually work: git rev-list 7ac749c^@..7ac749c fatal: ambiguous argument '7ac749c^@..7ac749c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. yet "^rev^@ rev" syntax does: git rev-list ^7ac749c^@ 7ac749c 7ac749c96d143ba4f76723959892cbaddbe8ed07 Is it a bug or feature? Puzzled... Dmitry