From: Alex Riesen Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:13:54 GMT Subject: Re: Cherry picking instead of merges. Message-ID: <20080703201354.GA3546@steel.home> In-Reply-To: <20080703182650.GA11166@old.davidb.org> David Brown, Thu, Jul 03, 2008 20:26:50 +0200: > Yesterday, one developer cherry picked company B's changes into a branch. > It appears he resolved the conflicts for each commit, which should make > bisecting easier. > > The problem is that we now have very divergent history. ...and have absolutely no idea on what were the changes of the company B were made. > Any advice on how to make use of how he resolved conflicts in order to > merge company B's changes in using git-merge. ... Let that developer do the merge next time? Or let the B do a merge with a commonly accepted base?