From: Vaclav Hanzl Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:31:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Note about the meaning of "clone" Message-ID: <20080615.183150.74717434.hanzl@noel.feld.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: > You might also want to mention that the clone is not necessarily a > redundant _copy_ of the original repo, because at least for local > clones on the same file system clone will use hard links rather than > actually making a copy, unless you explicitly tell it not to. At the moment this is covered in description of the --local option (I personally found it very easy to get this knowledge, dislike other differences from 1:1) Vaclav