From: Seth Falcon Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:10:36 GMT Subject: Re: git and peer review Message-ID: <20080519141036.GV396@ziti.local> In-Reply-To: <20080519033736.GZ29038@spearce.org> * On 2008-05-18 at 23:37 -0400 Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Something like this, but its uh, ugly due to the use of a network > connection: > > branch=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) > branch=${branch##refs/heads/} > > remote=$(git config branch.$branch.remote) > merge=$(git config branch.$branch.merge) > > rb=$(git ls-remote $remote $merge | awk '{print $1}') Hrm. My use case is with an upstream svn repository and git-svn. With my .git/config, remote and merge as above are empty (I guess that is what one would use with a pure git setup). For the git-svn case, I think what is needed is the ability to ask git-svn about the local upstream tracking branch associated with HEAD. Since this is information already available to git-svn rebase, I tried adding a --dry-run option that prints out what I want. In the patch that follows I'm not sure if I've chosen the right terminology... -- Seth Falcon | http://userprimary.net/user/