From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:09:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Auto detaching head options (update) (Re: Working copy revision and push pain)
Message-ID: <20080331020920.GA412@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080331015937.GA32645@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:59:37PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> Why is 605fac8 beneficial? What common workflow is updating the HEAD
> branch through its actual name? If it is manipulating the index and

Apparently my reading skills are not what they used to be. In the
comment from 605fac8, it specifically mentions pushing directly into a
branch that is the same as HEAD. But that is one of the cases that we
Jan is trying to improve, so I don't see a problem with reverting in
favor of his proposal.

-Peff