From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:26:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH (amend)] diff: Make numstat machine friendly also for renames (and copies)
Message-ID: <200712110226.35343.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vejdujazu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Previous version of this patch (from 7 May 2007) used instead of current
> > only "to_name" format similar to git-diff-tree raw format for renames:
> >
> >   added deleted TAB path for "src" TAB path for "dst" LF
> >     
> > The problem was when -z option was used: how to separate end of record
> > from end of from_name and start of to_name. For git-diff we have status
> > to distinguish those; no such thing for numstat output. Previous version
> > of patch used (or was to use actually, because of error in the code)
> >
> >   added deleted TAB path for "src" NUL NUL path for "dst" NUL
> >
> > when -z option was used.
> 
> I think the cleanest at this point is to have --numstat-enhanced that
> shows
> 
> 	<added> <deleted> <status> <path1>
> 	<added> <deleted> <status> <path1> <path2>
> 
> Anything else would be a regression.

That is the plan[*1*]. Nevertheless always using destination filename for
"ordinary" numstat is a step in good direction. I don't think that would
break _any_ scripts (as previous version was not good to be parsed by
a machine); I think it is even more probable that old version _broke_
scripts if -M / -C was provided.

[*1*] When I (or somebody else) find time for that.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland