From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:36:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [StGit RFC] A more structured way of calling git
Message-ID: <20071116083621.GA18039@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20071116074255.GA16975@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

On 2007-11-16 08:42:55 +0100, Karl Hasselström wrote:

> The complete state that would have to be saved would be
>
>   * (patchname, commit sha1) pairs for all patches
>
>   * (branchname, branch head sha1) pair
>
>   * the ordered lists of applied, unapplied, and eventually also
>     hidden patches

Oh, and

  * .git/config (one blob)

  * the worktree (one tree object?)

  * the index (one tree object per stage?)

Otherwise, we won't be able to un-clobber them. But a first
implementation could certainly skip this part.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle