From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:42:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement git commit as a builtin command.
Message-ID: <20071102094249.GB30468@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7vsl3p3s48.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 2007-11-02 02:37:43 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> writes:
>
> > I wonder if it would be such a bad idea to make this the default.
> > It seems like _everyone_ who should be using it forget it. And the
> > number of patches made for human or git consumption is probably
> > vastly larger than the number of patches made for consumption by
> > other tools.
>
> On this mailing list, we can pretty much assume that renaming diff
> can be applied by people. But outside world is a different story.

So I guess a prerequisite for this is to get git patch format support
into GNU patch, then? :-)

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle