From: Jeff King Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:48:48 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change "refs/" references to symbolic constants Message-ID: <20071002204848.GA8284@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <7vsl4tjo28.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:47:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > - it makes typo harder to make and easier to spot > (e.g. "refs/head/"); > > - it makes miscount harder to make and easier to spot (e.g. > what is this magic constant 11? Is it strlen("refs/heads/")?); > > - it makes reviewing the resulting code, and more importantly, > future patches on the resulting code, easier. > [...] > It however actively hurts on the third count. These long Yes, I find some of the substitutions more readable, but some are a bit less readable. The parts of the patch I found the _most_ improved are the ones that get rid of a memcmp in favor of a prefixcmp (i.e., removing the count entirely). Perhaps a better quest would be to eliminate all of those counts entirely with code that is obviously correct. I think it is much more readable to replace: url = xmalloc(strlen(repo->base) + 64); sprintf(url, "%s/objects/pack/pack-%s.idx", repo->base, hex); with something like: strbuf_init(&url); strbuf_addf(&url, "%s/objects/pack/pack-%s.idx", repo->base, hex); which has the same number of lines, but no magic numbers at all. Or since most of the uses of things like PATH_OBJECTS are more or less the same, maybe something like: mkpath_object(&url, "pack/pack-%s.idx", hex); i.e., rather than fiddling with string constants, wrap them functionally. > constants in CAPITAL_LETTERS_WITH_UNDERSCORE shout too loudly to Part of the problem is also that they're long. Perhaps REFS_HEADS, while being less unique in the C namespace, would look better? -Peff