From: Jeff King Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:01:05 GMT Subject: Re: diffcore-rename performance mode Message-ID: <20070918090105.GA11854@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <7vhclswdsm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:58:17AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I thought we were holding counts of hashes, in which case there _is_ no > > overflow. > > The raw hashval (the fingerprint recorded in struct spanhash) is > further reduced and used as an index into spahash_top.data[]. > So more than one hashval can try to sit in the same slot in > spanhash_top.data[] array. Right, that's sort of what I was hinting at in the original message. Can we just make the hash table big enough to use the fingerprint hashes directly? It's going to use a bit more memory, but lookups should be very fast. I'll try to experiment and get some numbers. -Peff