From: Christian Couder Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:19:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rev-list --bisect: Move finding bisection into do_find_bisection. Message-ID: <200709170519.19504.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> In-Reply-To: <7vk5qr575a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Le dimanche 16 septembre 2007, Junio C Hamano a écrit : > > +static struct commit_list *do_find_bisection(struct commit_list *list, > > + int nr, int *weights); > > + > > /* > > * zero or positive weight is the number of interesting commits it can > > * reach, including itself. Especially, weight = 0 means it does not > > The comment whose top part we can see here talks about the magic > values -1 and -2 used while do_find_bisection() after the > refactoring does its work, and these magic values are never > visible to the calling function. You should move the comment to > the top of do_find_bisection() as well. > > Also this forward declaration is unwarranted. A bottom-up > sequence to define do_find_bisection() first, then to define its > sole caller find_bisection() next is easier to read at least for > me. > > The latter comment also applies to your other patch. All right, I will send new patchs with these changes. Thanks, Christian.