From: Jeff King Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:58:49 GMT Subject: Re: suggestion for git rebase -i Message-ID: <20070728085849.GB13993@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20070728084550.GA13993@sigill.intra.peff.net> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 04:45:51AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > a file in a pre-existing editor session. I realize this is a small > > > nit, but how about renaming the file to "git-rebase-todo"? > > > > Why? This is an implementation detail, and should not concern the user. > > Because if you want to setup macros or syntax highlighting specific to > editing git-rebase tempfiles, then you have to figure out somehow that > you are editing one. Using a more informative name for the tempfile > means that you can guess based on the filename. Re-reading his original message, I actually don't think this is what he wanted it for. But I think it's reasonable to give the tempfile a meaningful name anyway for this reason. -Peff