From: Marco Roeland <marco.roeland@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:30:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Errors building git-1.5.2.2 on 64-bit Centos 5
Message-ID: <20070619143000.GA15352@fiberbit.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <18039.57099.57602.28299@lisa.zopyra.com>

On Tuesday June 19th 2007 at 08:50 Bill Lear wrote:

> Well, I'll try that, but this is a fresh install of Centos 5, not a
> custom-hacked OS, and I would think that git should build out of the
> box on it.

Yes it should, but your error messages do suggest there is a mismatch
between headers and libraries for the iconv functions. And as on Linux
those are in libc, which is always linked in, it suggests there is a roque
header perhaps!
> 
> I checked and there is no iconv package (rpm).  I really don't want
> to have to temporarily rename a header.  I can't hand this out to
> the rest of the company, some of whom do not have root access to
> be able to rename header files.

You might at least investigate if there is somehow another iconv.h
header besides the system one under /usr/include, that might have been
used by the compiler instead of the standard one from GNU libc.
-- 
Marco Roeland