From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:10:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] git integrated bugtracking
Message-ID: <20070603171040.GE6992@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070603151921.GB30347@artemis>

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:19:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>   Another think that notes do not address are another operation we
> usually do on bugs: merge (or duplicates). There is a think I hate in
> bugzilla and love in debbugs, it's that duplicate bugs are closed in the
> former, and merged in the latter. When two bugs are the same, their
> history are often *both* valuable, and you really don't want to lose one
> half, you want to merge them. And you also want the option to "unmerge"
> them, but for that the better option is to have the ability to duplicate
> a bug (aka debbugs cloning).

I can't wait for visualising the history of bugreports in gitk, along
with duplicates/forks and merges :)

>   Anyways it's just gossip, but maybe someone will have a brilliant
> ideas, so I'm just throwing my thoughts into this mail :)

/me wishes all gossip would be as productive as this one :)

Best regards,
-- 
Yann