From: Johannes Sixt Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 05:27:23 GMT Subject: Re: git log -S problem Message-ID: <200705210727.23898.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> In-Reply-To: <7vy7jjjjdm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Sunday 20 May 2007 23:05, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Sixt writes: > > I had expected that the set of commits found by the second search string > > are a proper superset of those found by the first one. What's wrong here? > > Why does a search for 'merge-base' not find occurences of > > 'builtin-merge-base'? > > 71dfbf224 removes one line that has "git-merge-base$X" and adds > one line that has "builtin-merge-base.o". If you count the > number of occurences of substring "builtin-merge-base" in the > preimage and the postimage, you see one addition. If you count > the same for substring "merge-base", the net difference is 0. But is this how -S is *designed* to work? Hm, the documentation says (diff-options.txt): -S:: Look for differences that contain the change in . which can be interpreted both to match my expectations as well as the current implementation. -- Hannes