From: Peter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:31:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG] git-new-workdir doesn't understand packed refs
Message-ID: <20070418183156.GF5913@xp.machine.xx>
In-Reply-To: <7vlkgph7i0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:17:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Peter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:23:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> 
> >> Recursively dereferencing the symbolic link by hand to a limit
> >> to avoid infinite recursion (error out when we reach the limit)
> >> would be a more elaborate solution that probably is the right
> >> thing to do.
> >>
> > I thought about the case where packed-refs is a symlink to another symlink
> > and then decided that it's not worth to implement this because a workdir
> > should be linked to a _repo_ and not another workdir.
> 
> That's incredibly weak, as the initial motivation of this patch
> is that you did not want to say "you should run gc only in the
> _repo_ not in workdir".
> 

Yes. That's my motivation and it works right now

	git init a
	<hack, hack, hack,>
	git commit -a

	git-new-workdir a b 	# allowed
	git-new-workdir a c	# allowed

	git-new-workdir b d	# NOT ALLOWED

The user should only create new work dirs which refere to the repo and not
to another workdir.

But *iff* thats the only point for keeping my patch out I'll fix it, but
not tonight. (Leaving now ...)

-Peter