From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:24:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] Add a useful return value to git-check-attr
Message-ID: <200704171124.39140.andyparkins@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vzm57pcxp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Tuesday 2007 April 17 10:28, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> And your patch was a step in the right direction based on my
> previous patch.
>
> But sorry, you were shooting at a target that is still moving
> too fast, and you missed.  It's not your fault, as even I did
> not know where it was heading to, but my plan has been to have
> the scripts parse the text output, as we would need more than
> true/false values, as I did in the four patch series I sent out
> tonight.

Not a problem.  It was a couple of seconds work.  I added it so that I could 
test my keyword expansion stuff.

Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com