From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:19:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cvsserver: Document the GIT branches -> CVS modules mapping more prominently
Message-ID: <20070412221940.GH7085@planck.djpig.de>
In-Reply-To: <7v3b35jlj4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:05:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> writes:
> 
> > Add a note about the branches -> modules mapping to LIMITATIONS because
> > I really think it should be noted there and not just at the end of
> > the installation step-by-step HOWTO.
> >
> > I used "git branches" there and changed "heads" to "branches" in
> > my section about database configuration. I'm reluctant to replace
> > all occourences of "head" with "branch" though because you always
> > have to say "git branch" because CVS also has the concept of
> > branches. You can say "head" though, because there is no such
> > concept in CVS. In all the existing occourences of head other than
> > the one I changed I think "head" flows better in the text.
> 
> Ah, I tend to agree.  Mind if I applied only the first hunk then?

Not at all. Go ahead.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/