From: Arjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:45:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Optimized PowerPC SHA1 generation for Darwin (OS X)
Message-ID: <20070410114507.GA28728@regex.yaph.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070410094801.GA6148@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:48:01AM +0200, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote:
> On 2007-04-08 22:09:39 +0200, Arjen Laarhoven wrote:
> 
> >  ppc/{sha1ppc.S => sha1ppc.in.S} |  110 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 
> Wouldn't it be prettier if this filename was .S.in instead of .in.S?
> Additional file suffixes are usually added at the end (e.g. .tar.gz),
> and it makes more sense too.

Using the .S suffix makes gcc automatically do the right thing. .S.in
requires an extra '-x assembler-with-cpp' option to gcc.  Of course,
it's trivial fix.

Arjen