From: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:40:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-init: set up GIT_DIR/workdir if GIT_WORK_DIR is set
Message-ID: <20070312204041.GA31018@moooo.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <7vird6qlbn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> writes:
> 
> > I just thought that GIT_WORK_DIR should be relative to the current
> > working directory because it's more intuitive, e.g.
> >
> >     $ git --git-dir=/path/to/repo.git --work-dir=../.. add a
> >
> > where ../.. matches the path to the toplevel working directory from
> > cwd.  But this definitely is annoying when changing directories.
> 
> Not so fast.  That was a trick suggestion, only meant to see if
> you have thought through the issues, and you did not have to
> agree with me so quickly ;-).

Well, I have no strong feelings for either handling because I'll
probably always use `pwd`/relative/path anyway.

Is there anything more to this decision than this?

GIT_WORK_DIR relative to cwd:
    git --work-dir <path> [..] is more intuitive

GIT_WORK_DIR relative to $GIT_DIR:
    $GIT_DIR/workdir and $GIT_WORK_DIR are interpreted exactly the
    same way, which primarily makes it easier to implement git init
    with --work-dir :-)

> By the way, I do not find your command line example intuitive at
> all, whether the --work-dir= parameter is relative or absolute.
> Do you honestry expect that loooong command line is something
> people would use in real life?

For one-shot things I prefer --git-dir and --work-dir over
GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_DIR because they are lowercase and for
GIT_WORK_DIR it's even shorter; and all the examples were one-shot
things (well, one used the same --git-dir twice).