From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:06:55 GMT
Subject: Re: Git push failure with update hook success
Message-ID: <20070308100655.GG30289@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <200703081004.32666.andyparkins@gmail.com>

Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 2007 March 08 09:28, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Without adding some nasty switches to git-rev-list
> > > (like --all-except-this-branch), I can't see how the post-update hook
> > > could ever send emails with the necessary amount of detail.
> >
> > Which is why `master` now has support for a post-receive hook,
> > that has the magic three parameters.  ;-)
> 
> It still won't work - what about the 
> 
>  git-rev-list --not --all
> 
> Problem?
> 
> By the time that hook runs the master ref (for example) has changed, 
> so "--not --all" includes the new revisions, and you get no output.

Dammit.  That's so obvious.  And I missed it.

I got nothing at this hour of the morning.

-- 
Shawn.