From: Johannes Sixt Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:40:07 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not change the file type if the filesystem does not support symlinks. Message-ID: <200702281840.07893.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> In-Reply-To: On Tuesday 27 February 2007 23:54, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c > > index 605b352..f09ee2e 100644 > > --- a/read-cache.c > > +++ b/read-cache.c > > @@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ static int ce_match_stat_basic(struct cache_entry > > *ce, struct stat *st) > > > > switch (ntohl(ce->ce_mode) & S_IFMT) { > > case S_IFREG: > > - changed |= !S_ISREG(st->st_mode) ? TYPE_CHANGED : 0; > > + if (trust_symlink_fmt && !S_ISREG(st->st_mode)) > > + changed |= TYPE_CHANGED; > > Really? If the cache entry says S_IFREG we should not expect a symlink > here, right? Don't know what I was smoking here. This hunk just doesn't need to be there at all... > > > @@ -125,7 +126,8 @@ static int ce_match_stat_basic(struct cache_entry > > *ce, struct stat *st) changed |= MODE_CHANGED; > > break; > > case S_IFLNK: > > - changed |= !S_ISLNK(st->st_mode) ? TYPE_CHANGED : 0; > > + if (trust_symlink_fmt && !S_ISLNK(st->st_mode)) > > + changed |= TYPE_CHANGED; > > This does not handle the case symlink->directory, right? Something like: if (!S_ISLNK(st->st_mode) && (trust_symlink_fmt || !S_ISREG(st->st_mode))) changed |= TYPE_CHANGE; BTW, considering the size of the entire patch series, I'm thinking of submitting it in a single patch. -- Hannes