From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:19:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] commit-tree: bump MAX_PARENTS to 128
Message-ID: <20070227081933.GA13021@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vr6scj9qt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:16:42AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> But as Shawn pointed out, Octopus makes bisect less (much less)
> efficient for the end users, I tend to think the current 16 is
> already insanely large.

Did you look at my "why I need a huge octopus" description? Is there a
better way to do it? Should I simply do a bunch of pair-wise merges?
I'll almost certainly never bisect it, but the octopus "looks right" in
gitk (though I have to admit, it's really not _that_ big a deal -- it's
almost more readable to look at pairwise merges anyway).

-Peff