From: Michael <barra_cuda@katamail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:45:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add KMail in SubmittingPatches
Message-ID: <200702061445.07657.barra_cuda@katamail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vveigkmpv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano:
> Michael <barra_cuda@katamail.com> writes:
> > @@ -331,3 +330,21 @@ whitespaces (fatal in patches).  Running 'C-u g' to
> > display the
> >  message in raw form before using '|' to run the pipe can work
> >  this problem around.
[...]
> This is quite interesting -- notice your own hunk header @@ ... @@ line?

I see. It's this account's fault: now I know because I've tried with
another account. I didn't know it had this glitch, sorry.

> I do not use KMail myself, so I cannot comment on the procedure,
> but from the cursory look it *should* do the right thing.  Only
> that it makes me a bit nervous to see your hunk header being
> line wrapped.
>
> Doubly interesting is that somebody appears to have added two
> message IDs.
>
>    Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: add KMail in SubmittingPatches
>    Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:27:32 +0100
>    User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4
>    Message-Id: <200702051427.32532.barra_cuda@katamail.com>
>    Message-ID: <20070205132150.123659@dial-up-mi-449.lombardiacom.it>

This is my current account's fault too. So I used KMail correctly,
but my mail server did something to the message. I guess I should
use another account. Anyway, if some other KMail user has something
to say about this issue, it will make things clearer.

Bye.