From: Jakub Narebski Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:59:22 GMT Subject: Re: newbie questions about git design and features (some wrt hg) Message-ID: <200702021759.22603.jnareb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >> Gaaah. Why anyone would want to have non-propagated tags? > > That's *definitely* not the mistake. Ermmm... right. Now that I thought about it a bit... > I use private tags (and branches, for that matter) all the time. I'd be > very upset indeed if all my tags were always pushed out when I push > something out. Well, in git you can have private tags (anything not under refs/tags or under refs/heads is by default private), but I think you can only have not published branches (which are not pushed to public repository). If it is not true, then how one can have private branches (i.e. branches which 'push --all' would not push)? -- Jakub Narebski Poland