From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:50:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Document the master@{n} reflog query syntax.
Message-ID: <20070118025003.GC23124@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701171829240.27034@elephant.stardot-tech.com>

Jim Treadway <jim@stardot-tech.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> >-  of the ref at a prior point in time.  This suffix may only be
> >+  of the ref at a prior point in time.This suffix may only be
> 
> I'm guessing that the above was unintentional?

Yes.  Danngit.  Junio, can you hand edit that patch?

-- 
Shawn.