From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:32:40 GMT
Subject: Re: cgit vs. gitweb
Message-ID: <200612260132.41062.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580612251604s5e211518yd958fdc2e73232ef@mail.gmail.com>

Lars Hjemli wrote:
> On 12/25/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Lars Hjemli wrote:
>>
>>> I wanted to compare cgit against gitweb to see the effect of using
>>> libgit and internal caching. So I ran the attached scripts against
>>> http://hjemli.net/git/ and http://hjemli.net/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi as a
>>> very simplistic benchmark.

[...] 

>> Could you include ApacheBench (ab) results?
> 
> Sure (I didn't know about this tool, thanks for the pointer)
> 
> Here's the result of a few requests:
[snip]
> This does seem to confirm the results of my homemade scripts.

By the way, which version of gitweb did you use (shortened sha1 of 
commit, or result of git-describe)? I'm interested if it is before
or after Robert Fitzsimons patches which replaced 101 forks in
log-like views with 1 fork, which I think affects gitweb performance
a lot.

The page which is optimized is summary view, if you use projects_list
and not projectroot directory...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland