From: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:14:22 GMT
Subject: Re: Subprojects tasks
Message-ID: <20061216231422.GE25274MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061216225810.GD12411@admingilde.org>

On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:58:10PM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:07:04PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org> writes:
> > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:32:36AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >> I suspect the hardest part is "rev-list --objects" (now most of
> > >> it is found in revision.c).  [..]  But I think the updated
> > >> code needs to know that "link" needs to be unwrapped and
> > >> contained "commit" needs to be injected back to the ancestry
> > >> walking machinery.
> 
> Well, I already got to the point of using the commit directly,
> instead of any link object.

I think Junio is simply refering to the type of the object as represented
in a tree and that the value would indeed just be the commit hash, as in
your implementation.