From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:44:10 GMT
Subject: Re: when is a remote a branch?
Message-ID: <20061114204410.GK7201@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <200611142136.17517.jnareb@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:36:16PM CET, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Petr "Pasky" Baudis wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:31:18PM CET, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> >>
> >> By the way, with introduction of branches and remotes in config file,
> >> you can say:
> >>  [branch "localbranch"]
> >> 	remote = someremote
> >>  [remote "someremote"]
> >> 	fetch = remotebranch:localbranch
> >> 	push  = remotebranch:localbranch
> >> 
> >> and that would be equivalent to example branches file from
> >> the beginning of this email.
> > 
> > According to the documentation, this is not really useful since this
> > just tells what should git fetch default to when on branch
> > "localbranch". But "localbranch" is still just a branch representing a
> > state in a remote repository, so you should never be _on_ it in a sane
> > setup, but instead on a different branch which tracks it.
> 
> Oh. Can you "git fetch Localbranch" _without_ repository named 
> "localbranch" in above case?

So that it would be equivalent to git fetch someremote, and also fetch
any other branches associated with that remote?

I would hope not. :-)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1