From: Shawn Pearce Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:56:48 GMT Subject: Re: win2k/cygwin cannot handle even moderately sized packs Message-ID: <20061107185648.GE26591@spearce.org> In-Reply-To: <20061107182636.GD26591@spearce.org> Shawn Pearce wrote: > Shawn Pearce wrote: > > Alex Riesen wrote: > > > >The patches are on the mailing list archives somewhere around > > > >Sept. 5th timeframe from me; as I recall we dropped them as they > > > >didn't apply on top of Junio's 64 bit index changes (which were > > > >reverted out of next anyway). > > > > > > I seem to be unable to find them. Does anyone still has the > > > patches/branch please? Junio, you did sound interested? > > > (God, I wish I have paid attention then...) > > You can't find them because I never sent them. *sigh* > > Too f'ing bad this .patch I created with format-patch doesn't say > what commits it was based on, 'cause I can't find anything it will > apply too. Or better, too f'ing bad I deleted that branch. *sigh* This thread has now proven without any shadow of a doubt that I can be an idiot sometimes. In this case my patch didn't apply because it was 3rd in a series; I had two of those patches but lacked the third (a simple cleanup patch). Redoing that simple cleanup let everything apply. I've pushed the changes out to repo.or.cz: http://repo.or.cz/w/git/fastimport.git in the window-mapping branch. Note that this is based on a slightly older version of Git (v1.4.2). There are two "tuneables" on line 376 of sha1_file.c, this is the maximum amount of memory (in bytes) to denote to packs and the maximum chunk size of each pack (in bytes). I planned on making these configuration options but didn't get to that yet. --